Vadim Smirnov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,496 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: driver verifier detected problem in winpk filter #7107
    Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

      Thanks for reporting this. However, this is a known issue and it was fixed in version 3.1

      in reply to: Problem in inf file characteristics value with winpk filter #7101
      Vadim Smirnov
      Keymaster

        You should use 0x40000 for LWF driver for system to install and start driver properly.

        To eliminate compatibility issue with original standard WinpkFilter LWF you have to generate new GUID and replace it in both

        NetCfgInstanceId present in my INF file is NetCfgInstanceId=”{5cbf81bd-5055-47cd-9055-a76b2b4e3697}”

        and

        #define FILTER_UNIQUE_NAME L”{5cbf81bd-5055-47cd-9055-a76b2b4e3697}” //unique name, quid name

        Then rebuild LWF driver.

        in reply to: Problem in inf file characteristics value with winpk filter #7099
        Vadim Smirnov
        Keymaster

          From your post it is not clear what kind of driver do you try to install along with WinpkFilter. Is it NDIS LWF, NDIS IM or protocol driver?

          Characteristics to use in INF depend on the type of your driver. For Windows Vista and higher WinpkFilter installs NDIS LWF filter driver and corresponding Characteristics value is NCF_LW_FILTER = 0x40000.

          You are using NCF_NDIS_PROTOCOL|NCF_FILTER|NCF_NO_SERVICE = 0x4410, which an example can be used for the protocol part of NDIS IM driver.

          So, if you are trying to install NDIS LWF driver you have to use NCF_LW_FILTER, if NDIS Intermediate then NCF_NDIS_PROTOCOL|NCF_FILTER|NCF_NO_SERVICE.

          If you are trying to create the custom build of WinpkFilter NDIS LWF then besides changing driver name please note to generate new GUID to be used in common.h and in INF file (NetCfgInstanceId). This value uniquely identifies filter driver instance.

          in reply to: Duplicated packets reproduced #7098
          Vadim Smirnov
          Keymaster

            NDIS-hook driver intercepts the particular binding between TCP/IP and network interface, while NDIS IM and LWF drivers intercept all bindings (between all installed protocols and network adapters). This explains the different behaviour.

            in reply to: WinPK Filter and VMWare #7089
            Vadim Smirnov
            Keymaster

              By the way, what version of VMWare are you using? In the neighbor thread of the forum we are discussing another example of VMWare behavior, although your problem were not reproduced.

              in reply to: Different output after Winpkfilter installed #7096
              Vadim Smirnov
              Keymaster

                Thank you for testing. One more question, what version of VMWare are you using?

                in reply to: Different output after Winpkfilter installed #7094
                Vadim Smirnov
                Keymaster

                  Most probably this is VMWare bridge, in order to support bridging of guest OS it has to put real network interface into promiscuous mode and has to filter out loopback indications. Since packets are repackaged by WinpkFilter it may miss to recognize loopback and reroute it. I have experienced similar problems when experimented with ethernet bridging. There is another post on forum regarding VMWare, so I plan to do some tests with it. By the way, do you experience any problems in getting IP address for the guest vmware OS bridged to real NIC?

                  in reply to: Different output after Winpkfilter installed #7092
                  Vadim Smirnov
                  Keymaster

                    From what I can see each outgoing echo request is looped four times. Probably this caused by loopback packet indication when outgoing packet sent from one protocol is indicated back to all installed protocols (without this functionality wireshark would not be able to collect outgoing packets). And in your test loopback packet is routed back into the network (note the decreased ttl). Difficult to say who has routed the packet as WinpkFilter does not implement routing but WinpkFilter repackages network packets and one of the installed network components may fail to recognize the packet it just sent out and rerouted it. What network components do you have installed? Here I mean protocols drivers like winpcap and various virtual machine bridge and NAT components? Details in the network configuration also may help.

                    in reply to: WinPK Filter and VMWare #7088
                    Vadim Smirnov
                    Keymaster

                      I had not heard about such issues before, however I think it can be related to filter layering with VMWare bridging driver which is also probably implemented as NDIS LWF or NDIS IM driver. In order to support virtual network adapter with its own MAC address VMWare bridging driver probably puts real hardware NIC into promiscuous mode and clone received packets to virtual NIC inside VMWare. Here you probably have a sort of conflict between filter drivers, when packets for virtual NIC MAC address are not delivered to VMWare driver. Could you try uninstall VMWare, reboot and reinstall while keeping Winpkfilter installed? It may change drivers layering and fix the issue.

                      in reply to: WinPK Filter and VMWare #7086
                      Vadim Smirnov
                      Keymaster

                        Could you provide more details in regards to network configuration. Who assigns IP address to your internet connected network adapter? By other words, is Internet network adapter connected directly to ISP or through the router/NAT wchich assigns IP addresses over DHCP? Does it changes anything if you manually assign an IP address to network adapter inside VNWare OS?

                        in reply to: New version of Device Filter #7084
                        Vadim Smirnov
                        Keymaster

                          At the moment we don’t have plans to update DeviceFilter for Windows 7. Regretfully this requires serious research but market demand for such tools is too low to compensate the development efforts.

                          in reply to: Replace array of data. #7083
                          Vadim Smirnov
                          Keymaster

                            Yes, you have to recalculate checksums if modify the packet content. What code do you need? Checksum recalculation?

                            in reply to: Problem with WWWCENSOR #7082
                            Vadim Smirnov
                            Keymaster

                              Probably the easiest way is resetting the TCP session which tries to fetch the image you would like to block. Manipulations with HTTP server responses is far more complex task.

                              in reply to: Captive Portal with WinpkFilter #7081
                              Vadim Smirnov
                              Keymaster

                                Philip,

                                That depends on the functionality you expect from your captive portal. iGateway is a simple NAT solution. What problems have you expirienced with it?

                                in reply to: VirtNet send packet to real interface #7077
                                Vadim Smirnov
                                Keymaster

                                  Yes, this is possible using WinpkFilter. You can bridge VirtNet adapter to the real network with WinpkFilter or emulate virtual network with WinpkFilter. However, note that if you use bridging and want your real card to receive packets for the VirtNet card MAC address then your real card must be in promiscuos mode.

                                Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,496 total)