Vadim Smirnov

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,476 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Vadim Smirnov
    Keymaster

      I just did a quick powershell test with the command line below, and it was correctly intercepted and redirected through the tunnel:

      Invoke-WebRequest "http://www.wiresock.net/downloads/wiresock-vpn-gateway-x64-1.0.31.1.msi" -OutFile "wiresock-gateway-x64.msi"

      I suspect you are expecting child processes launched from cmd or powershell to be tunneled. Note, however, that these child processes have different names and are therefore skipped by the filter. Of course, it is possible to extend the filter for child processes, but initially, I had no such intention.

      Vadim Smirnov
      Keymaster

        I wanted to ask about that for a while now, would you say Fast I/O should be faster than events-based approach?

        Fast I/O is not about being faster than events-based approach. The main idea of Fast I/O is to guarantee minimum latency, i.e. the time interval between the arrival of a packet on the network adapter and the moment it begins to be processed.

        Secondly, is there any way to figure out why ReadPacketsUnsorted fails (returns FALSE)?

        Normally, it returns FALSE when there are no packets in the queue.

        I also don’t see ReadPacketsUnsorted being used in the fastio_packet_filter class from the cpp examples.

        It is not really necessary in you have the sufficient number of shared memory sections.

        Also, slightly off-topic, but is there any way to get the packet timestamps out of the captured traffic? I find that getting it from std::chrono for every piece of captured traffic is having an impact on how well it performs and was wondering if I’ve just missed it. So far I’ve moved it out so that the timestamp is generated once for every batch of traffic and I wonder how inaccurate that will be.

        The timestamp is not implemented in kernel mode, but if it is needed, then adding it to a custom build is not a big deal.

        PS.: Just wanted to let you know that AddSecondaryFastIo is not in the documentation, but I saw how it’s used in the examples.

        Thanks for the point. Since this was an experimental API, I postponed its documentation until later. And then I completely forgot about it.

        in reply to: File paths for AllowedApps? #12307
        Vadim Smirnov
        Keymaster

          Great! Thanks for the update! And yes, the comma “,” is the only delimiter. Quotes are not needed even if path has spaces.

          in reply to: File paths for AllowedApps? #12305
          Vadim Smirnov
          Keymaster
            in reply to: File paths for AllowedApps? #12303
            Vadim Smirnov
            Keymaster

              Hi,

              Yes, that’s right. Both application name and full path name are available in the same context. E.g. “chrome.exe” and “C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe”. The code simply checks if the application name contains the string specified in AllowedApps/DisallowedApps. If you are interested, then I can change the application name to application full path name in the code and create the software build for you to test.

              Vadim Smirnov
              Keymaster

                Hi,

                The standard driver builds for Windows Vista and later pre-allocate (for performance reasons) 2048 packets of 1514 bytes each (9014 bytes for a jumbo-frame-enabled build). And this is the upper limit for the packet queue. There is no special event to signal when the queue limit has been reached, but if you are reading packets from the driver, providing 2048 INTERMEDIATE_BUFFERS, and getting all the 2048 packets returned, there is a good chance that some packets have passed by in listening mode.

                It is not a big problem to increase the internal driver packet pool and/or add an extra event (note that signaling an event comes at a cost) in a custom build of the driver. However, if you need to capture vast amounts of data from a high-speed network, you might want to consider using the experimental Fast I/O API instead. It allows up to 16 shared memory sections to be allocated to deliver packets from the kernel to user space instead of using the driver’s internal packet queue and the ReadPacket API.

                Hope it helps!

                in reply to: WinpkFilter Fast I/O cleanup #12282
                Vadim Smirnov
                Keymaster

                  Note that Fast I/O is an experimental API and is only useful under certain conditions. For example, when you need minimal packet capture latency, and you can dedicate one (or more) CPU cores to poll packets from the driver. Historically, I added it at the request of a user who needed it for an arbitrage trading platform. And it is generally focused on server applications, where you manage and control all available resources. For client-side solutions, I would recommend using traditional I/O.

                  Regarding your questions, please note that only one driver file object (one instance of CNdisApi) is allowed to use Fast I/O. And once you no longer want to use Fast I/O, just close the corresponding driver file object (destroy the CNdisApi instance) and the driver will do all the necessary cleanup. If you only want to pause packet capture, simply clear the adapter mode flags. To re-enable packet capture, just set appropriate flags back again.

                  Please let me know if you have any further questions.

                  in reply to: killswitch on connection loss #12277
                  Vadim Smirnov
                  Keymaster

                    Hmm, there are two main cases where a service can temporarily stop filtering the network (and thus allow AllowedApps to bypass the VPN):

                    1. If the primary WireGuard server is down and a secondary server configuration -fallback-config is available, the tunnel will attempt to restart using it.

                    2. When changing the configuration of network adapters (Wi-Fi/LAN switch, disconnecting/reconnecting the Wi-Fi network), the tunnel is also reconfigured and restarted.

                     

                    in reply to: killswitch on connection loss #12274
                    Vadim Smirnov
                    Keymaster

                      Could you please check if v.1.2.9 meets your expectations?

                      in reply to: killswitch on connection loss #12273
                      Vadim Smirnov
                      Keymaster

                        Hmm, yes, I think it makes sense. I will create an update over the weekend.

                        in reply to: erroe info->pModuleName && info->pModulePath #12267
                        Vadim Smirnov
                        Keymaster

                          Thanks, I have added a validation for these fields.

                          in reply to: Fail to GetTcpipBoundAdaptersInfo #12264
                          Vadim Smirnov
                          Keymaster

                            Have you tried to run any of the test binaries? For example, dnstrace?

                            in reply to: how to use wiresock? #12262
                            Vadim Smirnov
                            Keymaster

                              Could you share the config file you are having trouble with? Another question, did you test adapter (-lac) or adapterless mode?

                              Regarding mysqld, do you mean that it initiates an outgoing connection? Because otherwise, i.e. mysqld listen for the incoming connections and needs to be reachable through the tunnel, binding to the address of the VPN adapter will probably suffice.

                              in reply to: permit allowed apps to access LAN #12261
                              Vadim Smirnov
                              Keymaster

                                I use DisallowedIPs to exclude my LAN (192.168.1.0/24) for Chrome:

                                AllowedApps = chrome
                                DisallowedIPs = 192.168.1.0/24
                                in reply to: Fail to GetTcpipBoundAdaptersInfo #12260
                                Vadim Smirnov
                                Keymaster

                                  Hi!

                                  Have you installed Windows Packet Filter driver?

                                Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,476 total)