Home › Forums › Discussions › General › Licensing question
Tagged: License
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 months, 3 weeks ago by Vadim Smirnov.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 10, 2024 at 3:30 pm #13810
I recently came across the ndisapi project and am interested in using it for software we are needing to develop. However I am confused by the licensing setup. The ndisapi project has a MIT license, but one must pay money for commercial use? Or am I not understanding something?
If we have to buy a license we probably won’t be able to use it in our software, because although we are not a nonprofit, we are a very small business with a tight budget.
August 10, 2024 at 5:48 pm #13811Thank you for reaching out and for your interest in the NDISAPI project. I completely understand the confusion—licensing details can sometimes be tricky.
You’re correct that the NDISAPI library source code is open-source under the MIT license, which allows for a lot of flexibility. However, the Windows Packet NDIS drivers are a bit different—they’re free for personal and non-commercial use, but if you’re planning to use them for commercial purposes, I believe it’s fair to share a portion of the revenue.
I understand that as a small business, you might have a tight budget. If the licensing costs are a concern, I’m open to discussing flexible options, such as installment payments or perhaps a profit-sharing arrangement. My goal is to find a solution that works for both of us.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
August 10, 2024 at 6:35 pm #13813Thanks for the clarification.
I agree that it’s fair to share the revenue for commercial use, and I’m definitely not opposed to paying for a good-quality product. However we are looking to keep our end-user costs for this project to a minimum; and my main attraction to this library was the first-glance possibility of it being free. So I suppose we will continue exploring our other options, but I’ll keep this in mind if we can’t make something else work.
August 10, 2024 at 8:33 pm #13814Thanks for your openness and understanding. I appreciate your perspective on keeping end-user costs to a minimum—it’s a crucial factor in any project. However, I must emphasize that kernel mode software, while powerful, carries significant risks for end users if not thoroughly tested and vetted. We’ve seen cases like CrowdStrike that underscore the importance of using well-tested, reliable solutions.
That said, I understand the need to explore cost-effective options, and it’s great that you’re considering all possibilities. If you find that other options don’t meet your needs, please feel free to reach out. We’re here to provide a well-tested and robust solution that you can trust.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.